Iâm writing my lawyer as we speak.
Nah but wouldnât that be legitimately wild if someone pushed that to the point to where California had to make an exemption for temple OS specifically?
Dude now that I think about this I wonder if this could work.
CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com â¨2⊠â¨days⊠ago
I know this comment is a joke, but the CA bill requires age bucketing for to be provided by the OS to âcovered storesâ. Basically, any source of 3rd party programs.
Since TempleOS (at least, the original one written solely by Terry Davis) has no networking stack, no such âcovered storeâ can exist. I think thereâs not even support to load external storage drives, so all programs on the machine are either written by the user or provided first-party by the OS. I think TempleOS would be exempt on those grounds.
Sv443@sh.itjust.works â¨2⊠â¨days⊠ago
It does actually have âhalf-assed FAT32 supportâ and I remember LTT managed to mount something back when they reviewed it.