Comment on No u đ«”
Railcar8095@lemmy.world âš4â© âšweeksâ© agoBut we already have much more evidence than our eyes. If one of the explanations require to disregard millennia of worth of scientific advancements, I donât think you can invoke Occam.
Even in the times when geocentricism was the prominent accepted version, the shape was accepted as non flat.
That work is done, if you they want to challenge it they need to do their bit. Else itâs faith.