Comment

You asked for clarification on the second question, yet could at least have answered the first one. Seem like you are avoiding answering the first question.

I don’t know what your imaginary “hooman” is. Imagine a random human you don’t know. It’s that human, they have every human characteristic but it’s discovered they aren’t from the species Homo sapiens.

source

Sort:hotnew top

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
I didn’t answer it because equating slaves to livestock is reprehensble and disgusting. Of course artificially inseminating any person, no matter free or enslaved, is rape.

they have every human characteristic but

but

So they don’t then, do they?

source
- lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Of course they don’t, that’s why I used the word “but”. Now you also realized why I named them “hoomans” instead of “humans”. Good one!
  
  Kinda like we can say “odd numbers are the integers but the multiples of 2”. “But” meaning “removed”, “without”.
  
  Are you gonna answer any of my questions? I don’t want other people to have the impression that you avoid questions, but I’m afraid this deep in the thread they might feel like you’re avoiding answering.
  
  source
  - theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    I have already answered all of them. No one can answer the “question” (invalid due to the flaws I’ve identified that haven’t been addressed) that concerns the “hooman”. I would answer it if it could be answered.
    
    source
    lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    I’m really not worried about that being the impression folks take away from this conversation
    
    I grant you that.
    
    Now please remind me what was your answer to “If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn’t rape?”.
    
    Also please point out the concern with the second question that went unaddressed.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments