Comment on AI advice
Hackworth@piefed.ca 3 hours ago
vWq4lWUi3UG2AGj.jpg
The point isn’t that some models are better than others. The point is that yet again it’s an example that LLMs are not thinking machines and you can’t trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run a glorified auto complete.
Counterpoint: People are not thinking machines and you can’t trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run glorified slave labor.
Truly we are AI of natural world xD
My point was that some models are better than others.
Sure, fine, some get this right, and what else are they getting wrong? Something more serious and harder to spot?
I agree that we should never treat these things as oracles. But how often they’re right/wrong does matter.
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 hours ago
The point isn’t that some models are better than others. The point is that yet again it’s an example that LLMs are not thinking machines and you can’t trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run a glorified auto complete.
Demdaru@lemmy.world 5 minutes ago
Counterpoint: People are not thinking machines and you can’t trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run glorified slave labor.
Truly we are AI of natural world xD
Hackworth@piefed.ca 3 hours ago
My point was that some models are better than others.
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 hours ago
Sure, fine, some get this right, and what else are they getting wrong? Something more serious and harder to spot?
Hackworth@piefed.ca 3 hours ago
I agree that we should never treat these things as oracles. But how often they’re right/wrong does matter.