Comment on it keeps getting momentum

zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  "We are 20 years away from Fusion if we get X amount of money"

  • Scientists right before recieving less than 1% of X amount of money.

  source
• Azrael@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I’m no scientist, but i’m pretty sure there’s a giant fusion reactor in the sky. I think it’s called The Sun or something like that.

  source

  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Also known as a deadly laser

    source
  • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This annoyingly bright object in the sky is a giant fusion reaction, but not a fusion reactor

    source

    • NikkiDimes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s a lil bit if both

      source
• Malgas@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  A chart showing the required funding over time for possible paths to a reactor from a U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration document, published in 1976. A curve representing actual funding since then has been added; it is entirely below the one labeled “‘1978 level of effort’ (aka ‘fusion never’)”.

  source

  • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    There is no incentive to invest into Fusion technology, as it would make crude oil, coal, rare earths, other rate metals and minerals lose a lot of value. The graph you show is still very interesting and I never saw that before, so thank you for sharing.

    source