Comment

What, you saw a couple of em-dashes and reached that conclusion? I would argue – emphatically – that people are using the wrong methods to attempt to unmask LLMs. They’re literally trained on prose written by humans. We still know how to write.

source

Sort:hotnew top

rimu@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
No.

Copy and paste the body of your post into https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector or https://gptzero.me.

It’s ok to be deceived, I don’t blame you for it.

source
- Hexarei@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Those AI detectors don’t work, btw.
  
  source
- Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  So that I fully understand your argument, it is that other automation proves that what I posted is LLM output? Let’s sit with that for a moment. Your bullshit detector is accurate, but mine is not. This is essentially your thesis.
  
  I’d workshop this for a bit.
  
  source
  - rimu@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Ohhh, I get it now. Thanks for spelling it out.
    
    Sorry for hurting your feelings. I didn’t mean to imply your bs detector is broken but I can see how it would come across that way.
    
    source
    Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I would hazard a guess that you’ve spent less time in a newsroom than I have.
    
    source