What made you think it’s generated by LLM?
Comment on Words Without Consequence
rimu@piefed.social 1 day ago
Ironically, that whole article is LLM-generated.
hono4kami@piefed.social 1 day ago
Comment on Words Without Consequence
rimu@piefed.social 1 day ago
Ironically, that whole article is LLM-generated.
What made you think it’s generated by LLM?
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 day ago
What, you saw a couple of em-dashes and reached that conclusion? I would argue – emphatically – that people are using the wrong methods to attempt to unmask LLMs. They’re literally trained on prose written by humans. We still know how to write.
rimu@piefed.social 1 day ago
No.
Copy and paste the body of your post into https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector or https://gptzero.me.
It’s ok to be deceived, I don’t blame you for it.
Hexarei@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Those AI detectors don’t work, btw.
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 day ago
So that I fully understand your argument, it is that other automation proves that what I posted is LLM output? Let’s sit with that for a moment. Your bullshit detector is accurate, but mine is not. This is essentially your thesis.
I’d workshop this for a bit.
rimu@piefed.social 1 day ago
Ohhh, I get it now. Thanks for spelling it out.
Sorry for hurting your feelings. I didn’t mean to imply your bs detector is broken but I can see how it would come across that way.