Comment on Tankie
Objection@lemmy.ml 1 week agoI addressed your argument re “definition”, what the definition was, and what makes a definition.
That’s not what I said at all. That’s just repeatedly asserting “this is how I use it” while completely ignoring my point.
No accusations have been made, it’s all here for anyone else to see (as long as they don’t share your cognitive dissonance, that is).
What is? What have I said that demonstrates I fit your definition of “tankie?”
Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I didn’t say that’s what you said, I addressed how I responded to you. Obviously.
I don’t care what you are and don’t want to discuss you, thank you.
Tankie means “authoritarian communist”, regardless of what you are or what you think the word means. “Tankie” has nothing to do with “peace”.
Definitions exist independently of you, thank God!
Objection@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
You claimed that you had “directly” addressed all my points, and not just blandly repeated “this is how I use it.” Then you referenced yourself not addressing my point and instead blandly repeating “this is how I use it.”
Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Indeed, I said that I directly addressed your points because I did.
I never said “this is how I use it.” The definition exists independently of me or you.
And that definition is “authoritarian communist”, and has nothing to do with peace, actually!
Objection@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
No, it’s actually about people who support peace. I already explained why, in a point that you most certainly, 100% failed to address, directly or otherwise.