Comment on Tankie

• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I addressed all of them.

  You’re ignoring that because you’re wrong. And that’s fine. See you later, tankie

  source

  • Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    You didn’t address a single one.

    I wear the label tankie with pride. I do indeed oppose the use of tanks in the vast majority of cases, so I am a tankie.

    source

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I addressed them each, directly.

      And you are a tankie, because you are an authoritarian communist who wants to crush dissent with tanks or any other means.

      But you can’t! It’s a tragedy.

      source

      • Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Really? You addressed the argument that opposing war can be used to accuse the person of supporting the other side? The thing that you’re doing right now? Where? Apparently you even addressed it “directly!” I don’t see that anywhere. All I see is, “No, I use it to mean this” over and over.

        It doesn’t matter what you call me or accuse me of. It’s based on nothing. How did you come to the conclusion that I’m an “authoritarian” who “wants to crush dissent with tanks or any other means?” Was is because I said we should build fewer tanks?

        source

        • -> View More Comments