Discussing people you never met. Phenomena you never observed. Stuff you never, personally, with your own eyes, saw.
Discussion without empiricism.
Discussing people you never met. Phenomena you never observed. Stuff you never, personally, with your own eyes, saw.
Discussion without empiricism.
pimento64@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Take your meds
dope@lemm.ee 11 months ago
And then there’s replies like this. Defending it.
guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
What is your question though? Yes online forums exist, yes the information is often unempirical. But what is your question here? What is the “this” you are questionning yourself about? Are you asking why people debate each other? Why people are curious about subjects even though they are wrong? I just don’t get what you are trying to say here.
dope@lemm.ee 11 months ago
What is this conversation that I’m indicating here? What might you call it? What’s good, bad, strong, weak etc about it?
If a conversation that is empirically grounded is called “science”, what is a conversation that is empirically ungrounded called?