Comment on Student Parking
SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
But it’s good.
If parking is free, you’d still be paying for it indirectly through your tuition. By charging for it, only those who actually need it pay for it.
Imagine you don’t have/use a car but still indirectly pay for other people’s parking spots because they can’t be bothered to walk.
You already pay for stuff you don’t use that’s just the nature of how business works. Why draw the line at parking?
I personally don’t like public restrooms so if I agree not to use them can I get cheaper tuition? It’s not fair for me to pay for something I don’t really use right?
Car transit is literally the least cost efficient method of travel, and only affordable because it’s heavily subsidized.
Draw the line at parking because North America subsidizes car ownership waayyyy too much already
Nah. I paid 200€ a semester student contribution for a train ticket and the student parliament and stuff and 0€ tuition. But I ended up taking the 30min car ride instead of 2h bus+train and the car park was free (it was just a gravel plot but who cares).
AA5B@lemmy.world 2 days ago
My taxes and tuition are paying for literally billions of dollars for stuff at my states public university system that I never use. It’s a great investment giving us one of the best education systems in the country.
The picture doesn’t say where they are but my youngest is at university in a rural area about two hours drive away. They have plenty of land for parking and it’s tough to get anywhere off campus without a car. More importantly I need to take a full day off work to drive him back after break, when he could get himself there if there was a spot to park
Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Why burden the kids who don’t require parking with paying for parking for kids with cars?
Parking lots are one of the most expensive parts of modern infrastructure often requiring massive vaults or ponds to offset stormwater runoff increases from paving over large areas and rendering huge swaths of land ( 30% in some places) unusable.
Imo parking is subsidized way too much and bus routes are not subsidized enough. The solution before car companies lobbied mandatory parking minimums into existence was simply provide more busses per person
AA5B@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That may be fair in an urban environment where there is little space and there is transit or walkability, but you can’t just wish it into existence by making a few lives harder.
In particular, many universities in the US are in small town or urban areas. They’re great at not requiring cars to get around campus. But students should also have a way to leave campus or even travel, or have a choice to commute from cheaper or better housing. It’s not a prison and they don’t control their surroundings
Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Ok but how does that help the students that don’t need parking? You still haven’t justified why they should be saddled with subsidizing commuting students?
A better bus system seems like it would solve both problems, why is the only acceptable solution special priveleges for car owners?
Leonardo_da_Vinci@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Taxi.