me, playing for a draw: gigachad
Comment on pro choice
edinbruh@feddit.it 6 hours ago
Finite games are all definite, either player 1 as a winning strategy or player 2 has, all other “outcomes” are just mental illnesses. Get over it, math doesn’t care about your feelings.
robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 5 hours ago
Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 4 hours ago
robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 15 minutes ago
love that episode
Dupelet@piefed.social 5 hours ago
That would be true, except draws exist
okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
For games that allow that, yep
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 14 minutes ago
You can’t draw in pictionairy.
SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 2 hours ago
Tie goes to winner of the next game, easy fix
OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 1 hour ago
Congrats, the game is now non-finite (you can just keep drawing forever).
SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 1 hour ago
whoever needs to use the bathroom first loses, or if you die of thirst or hunger, that could also disqualify one from such a theoretically limitless dilemma. However if you have a mathematical way to measure boredom, and also introduce a rule that the person to truly become bored with the game would actually win automatically after a draw, the game could just be determined by some arbitrary momentary measure of chaotic outside systems, and given to one player based on some hidden scoring matrix of outside variables probing purely environmental or coincidental variables, to generate an arbitrary-enough-seeming-to-the-players (though not likely enough for the mathematicians) winner, in the event of a repeated draws which outnumber the lower of both of the single largest numbers that each player could think of, before beginning the challenge.