Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
davidagain@lemmy.world 3 weeks agosex exists regardless of my ability to discern it
- Yes, your abject uselessness at that shines through most things you say. At last something we can agree on.
- So having complained about me calling it unknowable, you admit that it’s undiscernable (which is of course completely different /s), we come back to the irrelevance of everything you said to everyday life.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Again, not undiscernable. Are you able to understand that?
davidagain@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I love that you admit that you can’t do it and even that the greatest experts mightn’t be able to do it but yet still believe it’s a useful definition! It’s a useless and crap definition! Actually useless! Complete crap!
Chromosomes are testable. Verifyable. Take a blood sample, some time in the lab and it’s done! This is why scientists use them to define sex. Your definition is untestable! It’s not science. It’s pseudoscience. It sounds plausible because it uses technical terms, and stupid people believe it because it sounds clever. But because you believed trump, who is famously very stupid, you have believed a stupid thing, and you can’t stop talking about it, in public!
If I found out that trump had duped me into believing some pseudoscience, I would be ASHAMED. You, not so much.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Sadly I think you missed this. Again, not undiscernable. Are you able to understand that?
You should let the author of this text book know that his definition is complete crap lol:
oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Wow stop the press! The author of a textbook says there are only two sexes!
The. Author. Of. A. Textbook!
davidagain@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You’re so clever.