Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
howrar@lemmy.ca 3 weeks agoA bit that can be 0 or 1 is binary. A quantum bit is not binary, even though it’s a linear combination of 0 and 1.
Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
howrar@lemmy.ca 3 weeks agoA bit that can be 0 or 1 is binary. A quantum bit is not binary, even though it’s a linear combination of 0 and 1.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Sure, but that’s not relevant here
davidagain@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Neither is your anti teams ranting.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
If you think science is anti trans, that’s completely on you.
davidagain@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
No, I think that unlike you, science is descriptive, explanatory and neutral and that instead of understanding the consensus you pick out one or two outliers who have let their politics interfere with their work.
You’re just the same as people who believe there’s a link between MMR and autism because you found Pons and Fleischman and some nurse you meet swears it’s a cover up by big pharma.
howrar@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Then I don’t understand your argument. I thought you were saying that since any definition needs to be grounded in the gamete type which is binary, then any definition would necessarily also be binary.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
What are you actually proposing? That an entire person exists in a superposition until they produce gametes?
howrar@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I’m saying that a definition based on something binary is not necessarily binary.