Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
howrar@lemmy.ca 4 days agoA bit that can be 0 or 1 is binary. A quantum bit is not binary, even though it’s a linear combination of 0 and 1.
Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
howrar@lemmy.ca 4 days agoA bit that can be 0 or 1 is binary. A quantum bit is not binary, even though it’s a linear combination of 0 and 1.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Sure, but that’s not relevant here
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Please please please stop dming me asking to cuddle my taint. Please stop!!!
davidagain@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Neither is your anti teams ranting.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
If you think science is anti trans, that’s completely on you.
davidagain@lemmy.world 3 days ago
No, I think that unlike you, science is descriptive, explanatory and neutral and that instead of understanding the consensus you pick out one or two outliers who have let their politics interfere with their work.
You’re just the same as people who believe there’s a link between MMR and autism because you found Pons and Fleischman and some nurse you meet swears it’s a cover up by big pharma.
howrar@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Then I don’t understand your argument. I thought you were saying that since any definition needs to be grounded in the gamete type which is binary, then any definition would necessarily also be binary.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
What are you actually proposing? That an entire person exists in a superposition until they produce gametes?
howrar@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
I’m saying that a definition based on something binary is not necessarily binary.