Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
howrar@lemmy.ca 2 months agoA bit that can be 0 or 1 is binary. A quantum bit is not binary, even though it’s a linear combination of 0 and 1.
Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
howrar@lemmy.ca 2 months agoA bit that can be 0 or 1 is binary. A quantum bit is not binary, even though it’s a linear combination of 0 and 1.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Sure, but that’s not relevant here
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Neither is your anti teams ranting.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
If you think science is anti trans, that’s completely on you.
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 months ago
No, I think that unlike you, science is descriptive, explanatory and neutral and that instead of understanding the consensus you pick out one or two outliers who have let their politics interfere with their work.
You’re just the same as people who believe there’s a link between MMR and autism because you found Pons and Fleischman and some nurse you meet swears it’s a cover up by big pharma.
howrar@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
Then I don’t understand your argument. I thought you were saying that since any definition needs to be grounded in the gamete type which is binary, then any definition would necessarily also be binary.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
What are you actually proposing? That an entire person exists in a superposition until they produce gametes?
howrar@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I’m saying that a definition based on something binary is not necessarily binary.