Comment on Study Featuring AI-Generated Giant Rat Penis Retracted, Journal Apologizes
ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 5 days agoEven better: one reviewer thought it’s not up to them to decide whether the images are okay. And another reviewer raised concerns, was ignored by the authors of the paper and then it was published anyways.
But I have to admit that it’s kind of ironic that your comment shows you didn’t read the article :D
daannii@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I did skim it. Where did it say any of about the reviewers. All I saw was it mentioned multiple people and where they were from. But no issues.
ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 5 days ago
Don’t worry, you’re not a peer reviewer. It was just a funny coincidence