Comment on Snitches get switches

• Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  ls “conservation land” something special, then?
  English Wikipedia seems not to know it, and dictionary translated it to “Landschaftsschutzgebiet” in my language, which is like the most unprotective “protection” category there is.

  source

  • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’m from the states and I took this as “national park” (or perhaps state) land. It’s land intended for ecological conservation.

    source

    • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      But in that case, pretending to be a blind prirate makes even less sense!

      From the National Park Service website:

      Report invasive species. Locating invasive species just as they are beginning to invade an area and treating new infestations quickly is a management approach called Early Detection Rapid Response (EDRR). In a national park, let a ranger know when you spot invasive species. They will want to know the location (GPS coordinates if possible), the name of the invasive species, when you saw it, and photos of the species.

      Thoroughly note it and report that stuff!

      source

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Well yes, those are the rules. But if I see someone ripping out invasives themselves…

        I didn’t see it.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Try using context clues for a brief second

    source

    • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I did, even did some additional research trying to clear up ambiguous terms (what’s a “conversation area”?) and looked up rules in another country (US) that was referenced by a less confused person.

      Meme still doesn’t make sense.
      Should even be the complete opposite.
      If you recognize it, report invasive species!

      If there are hidden context clues I missed, please point them out to me, so that I will learn why I am the moron and not some of the others here that post stuff that just don’t make sense given the facts.

      Is the original post perhaps satire?

      source

      • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Are you satire of some kind?

        source
  • grue@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It could mean anything from private land with an easement to prohibit building on it to a National Park, depending on context and jurisdiction. It’s just a non-specific term for “land that is conserved in some way.”

    source

    • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Yeah, I guessed that much myself by now.

      So there is no deeper meaning but the meme is just crappily ill-defined and because of this actually doesn’t make sense.

      source

      • grue@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I mean, it’s sufficiently descriptive to imply that randos shouldn’t be messing with the plants on it. As a native English speaker, it makes sense just fine.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The nomenclature is really messy across countries and even sub-country entities. The Portuguese language Wikipedia even highlights the mess:

    Nomenclature diversity across countries. // Some surveys estimate protected areas in different countries and regions are called by at least a hundred names, and not uncommonly countries have their own categories of protected spaces, roughly similar to the protected space concept defined by the IUCN.

    From that I guess the restrictions associated with those spaces also change, and in some you aren’t supposed to remove local fauna and/or flora.

    source
• cenzorrll@piefed.ca ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Some of it, at least with plants, is that the invasive species has taken over a niche of the native species. So in removing it, you alter the balance of the ecosystem. Native birds in an area may be at more risk than a native bush due to a loss in habitat, so it’s better to leave an invasive bush if it provides that need for the bird

  source