I still don’t like it. The models being built on non-consensually scraped artwork has been known from the very start. If they still thought these were ok to use, I don’t really want to get involved with their output… It’s the same as when a company quickly pull the genAI art when busted, “oops we didn’t mean to include it” - then maybe don’t use it in the first place?
Comment on Indie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usage
jali67@lemmy.zip 3 weeks agoUsed for background assets. It was promptly removed through a patch. It’s not as egregious as it sounds.
kazerniel@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
maximumbird@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Human workers could’ve made background assets.
FUCK AI
jali67@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
It didnt replace anyone. The workers used AI 🤦♂️
can@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
An equal amount that would have worked on it otherwise? Even so do you think that will continue to be true?
jali67@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
You’re quite literally speculating and probably have no tech background
fonix232@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
Human workers did make those assets. Using AI. As placeholders.
Maybe stop the rate hating for a moment to understand the situation before you comment absolute shite?
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Correction: the robot made them, and human workers who were paid to watch it like a microwave used them.
fonix232@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
Tell me you never used AI tools in your workflow without telling me.