Comment on Indie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usage
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 11 hours agoThis time yes. But the rule ban any and all AI use during development. It doesn’t matter if it’s in the final product or not.
vxx@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
www.indiegameawards.gg/faq
You arent developing a game when you sennd Emails to someone. Same as you’re not a developer when you do the finances.
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
What about AI based autocomplete in an IDE, would that disqualify a game from this specific award?
vxx@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Would you consider it your own code or Code that was generated by AI?
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
It’s a weird gray area. Nobody really knows where the limit is. The current consensus is that for a fact the “AI” can’t own a copyright to anything.
How smart can an autocomplete be before it takes away your copyright? Does using snippets count? How smart can the snippet engine be at filling the template?
If I ask AI how to solve something but write the exact same code myself, is it mine?
It If I grab code from stack overflow, does it make it mine?
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
If you’re sending emails related to the development of the game you’re developing to other people developing that same game, you’re NOT developing the game? What kind of bullshit mental gymnastics is this?
vxx@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Sending Emails related to development is still not development itself.
If youre washing your gymnastic clothes, it’s not considered doing gymnastics .
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
Bad analogy. Communication is part of team development. If you’re pitching ideas, redefining requirements or requesting additional assets, you’re developing the game…