Comment on

• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  summarized

  Oh, then surely the Google AI can tell us exactly what it summarized, right?

  source

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    If you’re not happy to see it then move along. Why you feel the need to comment on things you don’t like.

    I’m happy to see so I’ll stay and engage.

    source

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I’m just questioning the use of “summarizing” here.

      source

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Ah by bad.

        Is it wrong to use that word in the context I did?

        Summarize: verb

        give a brief statement of the main points of (something)

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• DahGangalang@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’m mostly cool with it because they disclosed it was AI up front. Its also a summarization (vs OC), so even if it isn’t exactly correct it probably just mixed up a year/dollar value pairing at worst.

  source

  • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I did skim a bunch of articles first, all with the same info, but they were too long-winded or paywalled to link to. This summary seemed just right…

    source

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Yup, this (I feel) is one of the few areas where AI is valuable.

      I’ve got a buddy who just got hired on at a large company as a software developer. Apparently their code base is so arcane and in such unusual frameworks that they recently fed all their documentation to an LLM and are using that to help onboard new employees (vs trying to have experts try to train up people personally).

      source
  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Must be the time of day, as I’ve disclosed before and been downvoted to oblivion. This place is exhausting at times.

    To think I found people more cynical than me, now that’s impressive.

    source