If that was true, why would the game removing fictional minors for a distinctly unsexual situation not remedy the rejection? Come on now
Comment on the game "Horses" now barred on Steam, Epic and Humble Bundle
Stabbitha@lemmy.world 18 hours agoMaybe look up why the game was rejected from Steam in the first place.
Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
As like 3000 other comments here have explained, Valve has a zero tolerance policy for what they consider CSAM, meaning they will not reconsider. Which is their prerogative.
zqps@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
The distinction may seem like nitpicking but no, CSAM is a legally defined term of depicting actual children being sexually abused.
This game does not feature any such content. Not just because there are no depictions of real children, but also because the fictional children depicted aren’t sexually abused.
Valve’s language cites “sexual conduct” which in this case reportedly (I didn’t watch it myself) has been stretched to include nudity that is non-sexual in nature.
I get why Valve would err on the side of caution, but that TOS decision is no basis to turn around and make the legally relevant claim that the game features actual CSAM.