FUD
What is this, a crypto forum? You make it sound like they’re trying to single-handedly tear down GrapheneOS or something.
FUD
1) GrapheneOS is a non-profit out of Canada.
2) It’s an “independent contractor” role. California has specific laws governing the classification of workers as employees versus independent contractors.
LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
1) doesn’t matter as long as they have employees in California
2) doesn’t state it must be for employees only, it’s for any job posting
l3db3tt3r@piefed.social 1 day ago
Let me do the work for you; since you’d rather just spread FUD then look for facts.
1) https://www.linkedin.com/company/grapheneos/people/
- 0 California “employees” listed
2) https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/SB3_FAQ.htm (I just want to point out that there is a distinction; and I am not a lawyer)
“Any individual performing any kind of compensable work for the employer who is not a bona fide independent contractor would be considered and counted as an employee, including salaried executives, part-time workers, minors, and new hires.”
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Cool, that’s why my original comment says might. I don’t keep track of where random organizations employ people.
You linked to a page about minimum wage, not the law related to job postings.
l3db3tt3r@piefed.social 1 day ago
It isn’t criticism if it isn’t based on fact.
The U in FUD stands for Uncertainty; and what do you think “might” falls under, or it’s relation to sowing Doubt?
The law related to job postings, is a labor law, that also covers minimum wage, and uses the same definitions.
Labor Code Section 432.3 (Pay Transparency Law)
Labor Code Section 1197.5 - California Equal Pay Act (Fair Pay Act)
Labor Code Section 2750.3 (Employee vs Independent Contractor Classification)