Comment on Exclusive: jury in anti-genocide activist 'terrorism' trial 'told to ignore international law'
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
International law guarantees an unequivocal right of resistance, including armed resistance, to people under illegal occupation. Legal experts say that UK terrorism legislation breaches international law by blocking this right.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 month ago
However the jury are not sitting in an international court so that’s beyond their remit.
RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 month ago
A jury’s remit is whatever the jury decides is it’s remit.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 month ago
That’s not how it works.
essell@lemmy.world 1 month ago
With right wing nutters trying to undermine the rule of law all over the place, I feel like stuff like this isn’t helping.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I tried googling if you all have jury nullification, but just got AI slop and stuff about America…
The most I know about the UK legal system is the cool wigs, and what I learned from Sherlock and Misfits.
But I’d assume a jury can do whatever they want. As long as you’re not self snitching, you don’t have to explain anything. And we’re talking about government support of an ongoing genocide, it’s hard to expect jurours to solely follow the letter of the law.
grue@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You can’t not have jury nullification without destroying the right to trial by jury. Either the jury has the power to decide or it doesn’t.
RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 month ago
We do en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification#England_…
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Damn, that shits crazy:
No wonder that dude founded Pennsylvania
astutemural@midwest.social 1 month ago
Everything is within your remit. Fuck anyone who tells you otherwise.