It wasn’t all old data, but it was a lot. Why trust a corporation with your memes? You’re on Lemmy for a reason. You know how this ends.
Comment on The ancient Greeks or Chinese should have already had words for this.
REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 days agoI’ve been using imgur to save random images for what feels like a decade and not a single one has been deleted
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
tankfox@midwest.social 2 days ago
You’re not in england. England banned imgur because they’re trying to build a database of internet users for oppression purposes and imgur said no.
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, imgur isn’t banned, they were threatened with a fine, and it wasn’t because of three online safety act, it was because they were tagging user data with suspected age range, and selling browsing habits of children. The ICO said that they had to come up with a plan to exclude the child data from sale out they could be liable for a fine. Rather than implement a simple filter on the database, they implemented a complicated geofencing filter because they took offence at being regulated at all.
tankfox@midwest.social 2 days ago
Wow that’s a lot of pointless words. They were told to implement an internet user tracking system or be fined, but since they have no desire or obligation to do so they chose to cease operating under those rules. This has nothing to do with children and everything to do with tracking adults, there’s your ‘simply’. Trying to spin this as ‘protect the children’ is as hollow as your soul.
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You are factually incorrect and clearly haven’t read the ICO report, falling for the corpo spin instead.