how do you measure someone else’s intention behind an internet post? other than your own arbitrary judgement of it?
Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway
gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 9 hours agoI completely agree. I just wish I could systematically prevent myself from making any mistake lol, or like anyone from making the first mistake.
Anyone doing it intentionally is a dick and should be blocked. This is just an interesting problem for the platform we’re on and I’m excited to see how the Internet develops overtime to fix this.
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
I mean, I like the other reply to this comment as well, but if a man posts in an all women community twice in quick succession after being warned it’s pretty easy to assume their intentions are bad - right? Like there are things people can say or do that are so engrained in the behavior of bad faith actors that you can kinda spot them.
My point was just to reinforce that I agree with the notion that people can maliciously attempt to ruin a community or discourage individuals/groups from posting and that they should be banned. “No Nazi’s in the bar” kinda thing.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
That’s kinda the idea behind moderation.
It’s why it’s best done in small communites, as the context narrows the scope of the arbitrary judgement.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
…I guess we theoretically could, via a Lemmy or Piefed PR, heh.
As an example, we could implement an opt-in feature that pops-up community rules before one is allowed to post. Kinda like Discord, but less obnoxious.
gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
I think that’s a great idea.