Comment on "Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics.

Honytawk@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Uh, IDK about anywhere else, but in the US prisoners are supposed to retain their bodily autonomy even while imprisoned. the actual reality is that that is often ignored by the government, but that’s what the law says, at least.

  source

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Sure they still have rights.

    But not their right to freedom. That is why they are in prison. They aren’t allowed to leave.

    source
  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Ok, but only to an extent. Prisoners 100% get fingerprinted. Not sure if they collect their DNA too, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised; to the point where I already assume they do.

    source

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I know for a fact that certain places now mandate collection of dna for many crimes.

      source
• Piafraus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Is it already proven that they are criminals or do you want to remove someone right in order to prove they are criminals?

  source

  • Stitch0815@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Rights of people are regularly taken away to prove they are criminal.

    Searching peoples homes for evidence is probably the most common way.

    It’s also proven that Hitler was one of the worst human beeings ever to walk the earth.

    source

    • 0x0@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      It’s also proven that Hitler was one of the worst human beeings ever to walk the earth

      That’s only caused we haven’t searched the right home yet.

      source
• ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  that sounds good until laws are weaponized against freedom and normal people

  source