I’m not saying it’s the correct decision. I’m saying they’re a corp and corps always go the route of pride. They won’t admit fault, certainly not after the public reason they gave for firing the people in the first place.
You may be right, but I don’t see how that change the calculus. Should employees and union be complacent with corps’ bad and potentially illegal actions, refuse to defend colleagues, just to avoid hurting the corporation pride?
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 18 hours ago
I’m not saying it’s the correct decision. I’m saying they’re a corp and corps always go the route of pride. They won’t admit fault, certainly not after the public reason they gave for firing the people in the first place.
Sina@beehaw.org 7 hours ago
The shareholders may force them to bend tbh.
Hirom@beehaw.org 18 hours ago
You may be right, but I don’t see how that change the calculus. Should employees and union be complacent with corps’ bad and potentially illegal actions, refuse to defend colleagues, just to avoid hurting the corporation pride?
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 11 hours ago
Sadly breaking the law is legal when you have enough money in the bank.