It they’re not willing to admit fault then they’re inevitably announcing or implying standing opposite to and working against their workers.
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
That’s not going to change the situation because it would now look like R* admitting fault if they were to re-hire the people who got fired.
Kissaki@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
Hirom@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
R* should have thought of that before doing union busting.
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I’m not saying it’s the correct decision. I’m saying they’re a corp and corps always go the route of pride. They won’t admit fault, certainly not after the public reason they gave for firing the people in the first place.
Hirom@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
You may be right, but I don’t see how that change the calculus. Should employees and union be complacent with corps’ bad and potentially illegal actions, refuse to defend colleagues, just to avoid hurting the corporation pride?
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Sadly breaking the law is legal when you have enough money in the bank.
Sina@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
The shareholders may force them to bend tbh.