That’s a bit victim blame-y
Comment on The amazing world of tomorrow
30p87@feddit.org 3 weeks agoWhat? It’s their explicit decision and risk to get into the car. Including acknowledging all the risk for themselves and others.
Zwiebel@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
30p87@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
That’s like strapping a bomb to yourself, exploding and then being the victim because you didn’t know you’re in a deadly situation.
You did know. If you didn’t, you shouldn’t be allowed to do previously said thing.
KitB@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
People who believe (because they’ve been lead to believe) that driverless cars are safe still have a right to live without injury. Being credulous or fooled doesn’t remove your rights.
Tja@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
Same for people who belive (because they have been lead to believe) that driverful cars are safe (despite being the lead cause of death for people between 5-29) still have a right to live without injury.
papalonian@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Can’t you make this same argument for normal driving, or practically anything?
“The splattered biker wasn’t innocent because he knew riding his bike in the bike lane was a dangerous situation, akin to strapping a bomb to his chest”
philophilsaurus@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Image