I thought its discussion of how much Civilization focuses on conquest, colonization, and combat over most other systems, to the point of it becoming a bit ridiculous if you try to go pacifist, was interesting. The year it was written didn’t seem a detriment.
not at all! it’s an ageless topic. just wild to read an article from almost 10 years ago that feels like it was written yesterday. Esp when Civ 7 is the new hotness, but Civ 6 still has more players.
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 days ago
I thought its discussion of how much Civilization focuses on conquest, colonization, and combat over most other systems, to the point of it becoming a bit ridiculous if you try to go pacifist, was interesting. The year it was written didn’t seem a detriment.
theangriestbird@beehaw.org 4 days ago
not at all! it’s an ageless topic. just wild to read an article from almost 10 years ago that feels like it was written yesterday. Esp when Civ 7 is the new hotness, but Civ 6 still has more players.
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 days ago
Ah! Totally misinterpreted your comment then, sorry 😅
theangriestbird@beehaw.org 4 days ago
It’s okay, I understand it came off a little snarky. I have a hard time not adopting the “reddit” tone in my comments. Lol