What? You don’t automatically trust “The Editorial Team’s” assertion at the bottom that “This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies” is valid? I mean they linked to a few other articles - the fact they’re only ones on their own site shouldn’t matter…
elderorb@feddit.nl 1 day ago
Does anyone have a link to the actual study? The article doesn’t seem to have it.
FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
NycterVyvver@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I got it from this totally legit article.
www.msn.com/en-us/health/…/ar-AA1HL99S
I know it’s legit because it has a picture of a Man Working At Home With A Laptop, Wearing A Shirt.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 day ago
Wearing A Shirt
And nothing else!
loonsun@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Yeah I’m a researcher in the field that studies stuff like this and it’s infuriating that there is no citation for this. I can probably find it but it’s just horrible “journalism” to have no citation to the subject of your article.
zipkag@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I haven’t looked extensively, but for the past ten minutes I’ve not been able to find any article. About 20 different news stories to say the same thing, but none of them actually link a peer reviewed published article.
loonsun@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
When you have to conduct a literature review just to find the results of one study there is something deeply wrong
NycterVyvver@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m having a tough time finding it. I found this citation from an article that appeared to reference the same four year study.
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjo…
GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
And to be clear, that study does not have those conclusions: