Comment on I'm not asking to be rich.

TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• MotoAsh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The question is whether someone has “enough” money. Until you can live comfortably, more money DOES buy more happiness. Once someone can comfortably live and engage with interests, more money doesn’t buy more happiness.

  When someone says, “money doesn’t buy happiness.” what they’re actually saying is they have enough money and they do not understand how poverty works.

  source

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    A billionaire doesn’t buy billion times as much clothes or food more than a comfortable middle class person.

    source

    • unfreeradical@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They buy sweatshops and meat packing plants.

      Try not to overplay the difference. Mostly they are just like everyone else.

      source
• angrymouse@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Money solve a lot of problems we aren’t trying to solve (as society) collectively.

  source

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Well, as a society we could solve the problem with money. We’re all too happy to print more money for people who already have lots of it, why not do so for people who don’t?

    source

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Because overtime, ppl that already have a lot will get all the money from por again cause they can make money from our necessities.

      source

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Sure, but if we’re constantly shuffling the deck, then won’t more people get opportunity to be successful?

        People blame a lot of problems on capitalism (or communism, or whatever), but really these are just neutral systems. The problem is people.

        People are irrational and selfish. Once their core needs are met, their desire to want things becomes overriding - but they treat it like a need. We need to win, otherwise we feel bad and feel worthless, even if we’re doing pretty ok objectively. Capitalism allows people to pursue these wins, but it doesn’t do enough to curtail people after they win what they need, and then make them work harder for the things they want.

        With capitalism, the big con is value exchange. You want to pay as little as possible, or at its core put in as little effort as possible, but at the same time you want to sell your output for as much as possible. So, in order to game the system, people lie about value. An employer pays their workers a pittance, but then sells their output as a luxury. A trader haggles down the sale price of what they buy, then inflates the price of what they sell. The price is never actually truly representative of work (which can ultimately be defined in time, ie 'man hours) but instead is controlled by what the buyer is willing to pay.

        These systems aren’t inherently wrong, they just assume that people will always play by certain rules. They don’t account for people figuring out the rules and trying to beat them.

        If the system resets every so often then this can help mitigate people gaming the system. It won’t stop people from playing the game, but it will give new players a chance, while incumbants have to stop dragging their feet.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • unfreeradical@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    To some degree money is creating problems and obstructing solutions, but as long as ut is use, it s necessary to antagonize wealth consolidation and to support universal income.

    source

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Can’t agree more.

      source
• Bobble9211@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  • Not worrying about having a roof.
  • Not worried if they can afford to eat.
  • Not worried about their body being sick and seeing a doctor.

  source