Comment on But why

• snooggums@piefed.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  No, King does not agree with Trump not releasing the Epstein files.

  King doesn't believe there is a document that clearly lists who is guilty of being a pedophile because that isn't how long running and successful criminal activity works. They have lists of contacts and hints, which have already been released, but not something so cut and dry as a client list.

  source

  • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Even if there is an explicated log book. It’s likely filled with worthless pseudonyms, chicken scrawl or some other worthless data.

    Making it worthless and basically what we already got

    source
  • Notyou@sopuli.xyz ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    but not something so cut and dry as a client list.

    Right. I know that. I assumed the ‘list’ people were talking about was able to be made with the actual information. Especially with the financial information on where the money was flowing.

    The idea that there was 1 specific list that was found isn’t the idea being pushed when people say ‘Release the Epstein file.’ King said he doesn’t think a definitive list is real, but we sure do have a lot of information that can be used to create a list. That list can lead to questions that might have valid answers. It will also lead to a lot of pedos…so I’m assuming protecting them is the point of Trump’s delay.

    King might have his own reason for not wanting a list of people not having to explain their connections with Epstein in the past, but I don’t care. Explain it and then move on, if you are innocent. It just feels King is arguing a red herring (about an actual list) instead of the meat and potatoes of going after pedos. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    source