idk, i have a hard time imagining a scenario where AI output is preferable to the alternatives. If one “needs” an AI to do something, they should just hire a human. They will get better results than they get from the word-association machine. Once AI companies stop subsidizing the cost of AI to attract users, the human will probably be the cheaper option, too.
theangriestbird@beehaw.org 19 hours ago
no one “needs” AI
mohab@piefed.social 19 hours ago
I think it could be useful in edge cases and the user needs to be skilled at whatever they’re using it for.
Reality is it is predominantly used by rich assholes to cut corners and get around hiring and paying workers.
theangriestbird@beehaw.org 18 hours ago
idk, i have a hard time imagining a scenario where AI output is preferable to the alternatives. If one “needs” an AI to do something, they should just hire a human. They will get better results than they get from the word-association machine. Once AI companies stop subsidizing the cost of AI to attract users, the human will probably be the cheaper option, too.