Wikipedia is a source of sources. You can scroll down to the bottom of the damn page and view the original sources if you really need the originals. No, you’re just using this as an excuse. Fuck off. Everyone can see right through this.
Wikipedia is a source of sources. You can scroll down to the bottom of the damn page and view the original sources if you really need the originals. No, you’re just using this as an excuse. Fuck off. Everyone can see right through this.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Wikipedia is policed by radical atheists like tgeorgescu who deliberately delete Christian sources
Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Lol. Meanwhile here you are, policing what people provide as evidence because you only accept something that supports your worldview. You should be a wiki moderator apparently… oh wait, they actually have standards.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Wikipedia isn’t a source. A whole Wikipedia article doesn’t back up your claim.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Wikipedia is a source, even in academics. It isn’t a primary source. If you’re going to be pedantic, you could at least have the decency to be correct.
Repeating this doesn’t actually address anything I said though. Presumably you can’t actually engage with what was said because you have no standing.