Comment on
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
big if true
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
banause@feddit.org 2 months ago
big if true
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 months ago
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.