Comment on
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
big if true
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
banause@feddit.org 1 year ago
big if true
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.