Comment on
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
big if true
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 22 hours ago
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
banause@feddit.org 18 hours ago
big if true
echodot@feddit.uk 15 hours ago
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.