Comment on Hmm this "unisex" bathroom seems biased...

SuDmit@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

I don’t really understand what is the end goal here. It isn’t minimising of total work done, because for this optimal strategy would be just leaving the seat in whatever position it was used. Funnily enough, amount of times it needs to be put up is exactly the same it needs to be put down in absolute terms, but considering the “up” group is smaller than “down group”, their perceived amount of times position should be changed is higher than the same for the opposite group. I. e. in group of one “up” and 9 “downs”, “ups” need to change position of lid with 90% probability, and for every “down” it’s only 10%. Huh. Ofcl course overall it equalizes: 1×0.9=9×0.1.

Or is it some kind of “welcomeness”? Like, leaving the lid in the most probable expected position (which for equal gender usage would be “sitting” because people sometimes poop, usually not while standing; and because penis people sometimes pee while sitting (me often, but usually at home, not in public)).

Or is it something else?

source
Sort:hotnewtop