vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
You really shouldn’t be including the actual binary/executable in the git repo. Best practice is to put it pretty much anywhere else.
vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
You really shouldn’t be including the actual binary/executable in the git repo. Best practice is to put it pretty much anywhere else.
danielhanrahantng@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
I’m sorry but I have been busy lately and why would you not want the executable in the repository.
Xanatos@mastodon.gamedev.place 3 weeks ago
@danielhanrahantng @vala
Git itself is meant to be used to track the source code and assets needed to compile or run a specific application, therefor adding a binary is kinda strange as it is already is created and not source code anymore.
There is a special place for that on GitHub. You should create a release for each version with information what changed and add the binary there as asset.
In a perfect world those binaries should be build by an CI pipeline but I think it's okay if not.
danielhanrahantng@beehaw.org 2 weeks ago
Ok thank you