Comment on proportional reaction
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Bah
Ternary is just a compressed if-elseif-else chain with a guaranteed assignment.
If you format it like a sane person, or like you would an if/else chain, then it’s way easier to read than if/else chains.
guber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
if else chain? believe of or not, straight to jail.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Hey, when you gotta pick a value from a bunch of options, it’s either if/elseif/else, ternary, switch/case, or a map/dict.
Ternary generally has the easiest to read format of the options, unless you put it all on one line like a crazy person.
guber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
me personally, i prefer switch case statements for many-value selection, but if ternary works for you, go ham (as long as you don’t happen to be the guy who’s code I keep having to scrub lol)
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 20 hours ago
Switch is good if you only need to compare equals when selecting a value.
Although some languages make it way more powerful, like python
match
.but I generally dislike python despite of this, and I generally dislike
switch
because the syntax and formatting is just too unlike the rest of the languages.Generally I prefer the clear brevity of:
Over
Which doesn’t really get any better if you remove the optional (but recommended) braces.
Heck, I even prefer ternary over some variations of
switch
for equals conditionals, like the one in Java:But some languages do
switch
better than others (like python as previously mentioned), so there are certainly cases where that’d probably be preferable even to me.thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If there’s more than two branches in the decision tree I’ll default to a if/else or switch/case except if I want to initialise a
const
to a conditional value, which is one of the places I praise the lord for ternaries.