Runs it better than any PC costing a similar amount.
You can barely get an entry level GPU for that.
Comment on How did it come to be that only two companies supply all of the world's PC graphics chips?
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks agoAnd runs the few games it does have pretty poorly, all things considered.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
survirtual@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This is nonsense and, frankly, sounds like guerrilla marketing for nvidia.
All things considered, I can play any game I want on the steam deck, which has an old SoC by today’s standards. A newer AMD gpu can run anything at max settings on a linux machine.
So again, either you are grossly misinformed or working for nvidia to sew gentle doubt. Either way, stop it.
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Do you not play many games? Good luck playing CP2077 with PT or heck even MSFS2020 at good (read: max) settings on 1440p.
The deck is great but I can’t even run NMS on high settings on it.
survirtual@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Why would I want to play at max settings? That adds very little to the gameplay for me.
I can play any game tweaking settings, and I can render at 720p + upscale if a game is demanding. This makes nearly any game enjoyable.
High settings are irrelevant, but if you want high settings, any AMD card from the past 2 years will more than deliver max performance for anything you throw at it.
For a handheld, portable device that costs under $500, I am okay reducing graphics quality for portability and gameplay.