I have a steam deck. It’s a portable, it’s really cool for what it is but as a main gaming system it can’t exactly compete visually with Path Tracing in CP2077 for instance, which I’d say is borderline required to enjoy the game’s visuals.
Comment on How did it come to be that only two companies supply all of the world's PC graphics chips?
rapchee@lemmy.world 2 days agolol “not being able to run games” have you heard of a little thing called the steam deck?
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
rapchee@lemmy.world 1 day ago
they point was about “not being able to game on amd”
yeah duh mobile chips are less performant, but still forza horizon 4–5 runs better on my steam deck than on my desktop pc with a 2080rtx in linuxFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 hours ago
At the same resolution?
Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Or indeed the PS5 which runs AMD chips.
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
And runs the few games it does have pretty poorly, all things considered.
survirtual@lemmy.world 1 day ago
This is nonsense and, frankly, sounds like guerrilla marketing for nvidia.
All things considered, I can play any game I want on the steam deck, which has an old SoC by today’s standards. A newer AMD gpu can run anything at max settings on a linux machine.
So again, either you are grossly misinformed or working for nvidia to sew gentle doubt. Either way, stop it.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Runs it better than any PC costing a similar amount.
You can barely get an entry level GPU for that.