But I am directing it at the right person. You see, you’re the person who said the words. That’s why I said the words to you. That is generally how conversations go. I’m glad I could be your teacher on these matters. Now, as for where my issue lies in you being a snarky little bitch for absolutely no reason, you posted the link of Richard O’Brien. You are correct in saying that you did put a link specifying the person. This is why I said “A straight screenwriter” because it was dismissive of the idea of Richard O’Brien being someone that fit this post.
This is the part where you come in and where I respond to you by the way.
YOU said “Someone skipped the reading assignment.” I know. I checked before making my last comment because I didn’t want to direct my cuntiness at the wrong person. However, as I found, my targeting array was functioning optimally. So when YOU said someone skipped the reading assignment, YOU because the sole focus of this because now YOU were arguing. Either that Richard O’Brien did fit (which is nonsense) or that my assessment of him being a straight screenwriter was wrong (It wasn’t).
Now should I get the crayons? Or have we both had enough bitchiness for a couple of days and are we both willing to just walk the fuck away from this like adults?
Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
Someone clearly skipped the reading assignment.
Stamets@lemmy.world 5 days ago
A third gender person who uses he/him pronouns and is married to a woman.
No.
I don’t think I did considering the entire post here was whether or not someone was GAY.
Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
All I did was share a link specifying who the person you were replying to was talking about.
If you wanna be a cunt, at least direct it at the right person.
Stamets@lemmy.world 4 days ago
But I am directing it at the right person. You see, you’re the person who said the words. That’s why I said the words to you. That is generally how conversations go. I’m glad I could be your teacher on these matters. Now, as for where my issue lies in you being a snarky little bitch for absolutely no reason, you posted the link of Richard O’Brien. You are correct in saying that you did put a link specifying the person. This is why I said “A straight screenwriter” because it was dismissive of the idea of Richard O’Brien being someone that fit this post.
This is the part where you come in and where I respond to you by the way.
YOU said “Someone skipped the reading assignment.” I know. I checked before making my last comment because I didn’t want to direct my cuntiness at the wrong person. However, as I found, my targeting array was functioning optimally. So when YOU said someone skipped the reading assignment, YOU because the sole focus of this because now YOU were arguing. Either that Richard O’Brien did fit (which is nonsense) or that my assessment of him being a straight screenwriter was wrong (It wasn’t).
Now should I get the crayons? Or have we both had enough bitchiness for a couple of days and are we both willing to just walk the fuck away from this like adults?