Comment on gotta blast!
Cattail@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Don’t you have to conjugate the ket? Like I don’t think braket is dot multiplication
Comment on gotta blast!
Cattail@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Don’t you have to conjugate the ket? Like I don’t think braket is dot multiplication
cooligula@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
You can assume a and b are real to make the joke make sense.
Eq0@literature.cafe 5 hours ago
You can extend the dot product to imaginary fields, there are a couple of standard extractions. If I remember correctly (but my quantum physics background is really poor, so I’m ready to be proven wrong) the one compatible with the bra-ket notation is
a dot b := sum_i conj(a)_i b_i