i thought the post was an anti-joke.
Comment on [deleted]
j4k3@lemmy.world 5 days ago
He objectifies candy and values it very little. He keeps it imprisoned in a picket. He is not confident enough in his ethics to speak directly and plainly. He uses ambiguity to avoid conflict because he knows of his inadequacy but chooses to mask it for his personal benefit. He has a poor diet to match his ethics with the self control of a child. He believes in a collective fantasy imaginary friend and fictional realm and is therefore a science skeptic with a lack of fundamental logic skills and is likely dominated by unstable emotions and anxiety. He outsources morality to a negative feedback system and is therefore likely masking depression. His poor logic skills likely means any money he has was inherited and will dwindle throughout his life in a long string of poor decision making. If he does not have money, he will never escape his caste in life.
phonics@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
Eloquently put. The downvote was someone who directly felt attacked by the truth 😁
Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 5 days ago
I can’t tell if this is a brilliant shitpost reply to pretty good shitpost or if it’s a genuine reply to a pretty good shitpost that still manages to out-shitpost the original.
Either way, I’ve been fundamentally changed by this experience and realize how much more work I have before I can claim mastery over this art.