Comment

Hackworth@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

I don’t see the relevance here. Inpainting saves artists from time-consuming and repetitive labor for (often) no additional cost. Many generative inpainting models will run locally, but they’re also just included with an Adobe sub.

source

Sort:hotnew top

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

I don’t see the relevance here

Anthropic loses $3 billion or more after revenue in 2025

OpenAI is on track to lose more than $10 billion.

xAI, makers of “Grok, the racist LLM,” losing it over $1 billion a month.

I don’t know that generative infill justifies these losses.

source
- Hackworth@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  The different uses of AI are not inexctricable. This is the point of the post. We should be able to talk about the good and the bad.
  
  source
  - UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    We should be able to talk about the good and the bad.
    
    Again, I point you to “implicit costs”. Something this trivial isn’t good if it’s this expensive.
    
    source
    Hackworth@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    The different uses of AI are not inexctricable.
    
    Many generative inpainting models will run locally
    
    Continuing to treat AI as a monolith is missing the point.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments