Comment on New idea
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 days agoI am sure laws vary by country, but going with laws here…
One is done with a glorified Turkey baster to livestock. The other with your penis to a woman.
Are we seriously comparing women to livestock here? But even AI to a human woman would be sexual assault, not rape.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Both are non-consensual penetrations of animal vaginas. The actors involved need not be the same species, as in bestiality, and the thing used to penetrate need not be a body part. How would you like it if the women loved ones in your life were vaginally penetrated with Turkey basters instead of penises? Makes no difference because the deed is the same: concent is violated and in a sexual (read: vaginal body parts = sexual body parts) manner.
I’m not comparing women to livestock in the slightest, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m saying that actions of rape DONE TO BOTH women and animals bear exact similarity. There is no difference between artificial insemination without consent of women as for animals, and there is no difference between vaginal intercourse without consent of animals as for women. Both of these instances constitute rape.
And artificial insemination without consent to a women is absolutely rape. It consists of vaginal penetration without consent. That is literally the definition.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
You must either life under a different legal system or your farmers are shagging their cattle to inseminate them for it to be rape.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
They aren’t my farmers. I’m vegan.
I sure do want them to stop their industrialized, subsidized rape work though
Malfeasant@lemmy.world 3 days ago
How does a farmer find his cows?
Irresistible!