Comment on MD = oMega Dumbass
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 17 hours ago
Devil’s advocate, is she trying to say compared to those unvaccinated but still exposed to/have had the virus? Or people who were never exposed? Because that could maybe change the context. You would think antibodies from a vaccine would stay around the same length of time as those exposed to the live virus directly.
If she is talking about people never exposed than I have no idea what she is talking about.
somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
No. Just no. For many reasons. Don’t be part of the problem. “You would think…” stop there. You don’t need to use conjecture when there is research at your fingertips. Signed - worked in bacterial and viral genetics and vaccine development for decades.
Jiggs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
I doubt asking questions is being part of the problem. Making claims of authority/expert on the topic, while no providing no adittional however…
Have you considered providing credible sources instead? Might be easier for you to discern them compared to the rest of us and would be much appreciated.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 hours ago
so what’s wrong with what they said?
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 hours ago
Well, let’s imagine that vaccine antibodies do actually stick around longer for a moment. All right. Who cares?
I could certainly think it was interesting. But concerning? In what way? “Oh no, I accidentally have too much money.” Okay. And?
This is essentially an appeal to nature fallacy. We don’t need to imagine she has a point to make; she’s trying to scare people.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
there is no fallacy being committed at all in this thread. and you haven’t explained why this is the case anyway, you’ve only hunted at a hypothesis.