Comment on AI industry horrified to face largest copyright class action ever certified

artyom@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• artifex@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  It has to set some precedent though. Either there are valid reasons to violate copyright are there aren’t.

  source

  • artyom@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Does it?

    source

    • artifex@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Ok reading a little more the class has been certified but it hasn’t gone to trial, so there’s still a possibility of a closed-door settlement of some sort, though given the number of parties involved that seems unlikely. Maybe I’m just being optimistic. But if it goes to trial and makes it to judgement there will either have to be cases where using copyrighted materials to train AI (which seriously how is that not for generating derivative works) is found to be ok, or copyright will be held sacrosanct and the whole gen AI industry will have to pay… something. Punitive damages would make the industry cease to exist overnight, and I’d bet most publishers would prefer a check instead.

      source
  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    That presumes precedent still matters. cough Dobbs *cough

    source

    • p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Supreme Court: What’s precedent again?

      source