Comment

Comment on Anon crunches some numbers

tetris11@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

Does that mean that many men died, and only few procreated?

Actively bludgeoned by another tribe and then thrown in a pit

why wouldn’t there be women skeletons?

They are not killed, but captured and carried away as spoils of war to the conquering tribe

Sort:hotnew top

Honytawk@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

They are not killed, but captured and carried away as spoils of war to the conquering tribe

So why aren’t there women skeletons at those conquering tribes? They had to die somewhere.

source
- arrow74@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  I belive you misread, they said a high number of males with evidence of trauma. Basically a very large percentage of male skeletons showed damage. The origin comment didn’t say there were no female skeletons.
  
  Also depending on the dig site mass graves of men killed in combat are common. Those would obviously lack women.
  
  source
- tetris11@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  
  So why aren’t there women skeletons at those conquering tribes? They had to die somewhere.
  
  There probably are, but we don’t stumble across them as easily as we do the mass grave dig sites I think
  
  source