Comment on Resources

• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Once again the survival of the species is not on the line because of that.

  That’s just an excuse you are making to justify a hate that have other roots.

  Prove is in the complete disregard of proposed solutions: remote work, decentralized offices, traffic reduction instead of complete suppression. And apparently disregard for other forms of pollution that could be reduced or eliminated instead, for instance, international traveling.

  source

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    population reduction

    Yep, sure, genocide is of a problem the less drastic option.

    You are a clown.

    source

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Last reply, after blocking your because your insult.

      Population control so not require any violent measure.

      It can be as simple as making people lives better, as it have been proven that populations with higher life quality have less children. Then achievong the objective of having a lesser global population .

      Discussion end here as you have been blocked.

      source

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        If we completely stop having children right now, worldwide, the population will not meaningfully decrease for the next 50 years.

        The major amount of climate damage will be done within the next 20 years.

        The only option to use population control to reduce climate damage would be to kill roughly half of the world’s population within the next 2-3 years.

        So if that’s your solution, you are either advocating for the greatest genocide the world has ever seen or are argueing in bad faith because you know that your solution is nonsense.

        source