There already is a solution. Parents need to be involved in restricting what their kids are viewing. Thats the solution, but parents dont want to do that, they want the sites to do the job for them.
Nope. Its already been tried. The internet is too ubiquitous.
And that’s like saying, all liquor stores should not require ID, and it’s the parents fault if an underage kid acquires some booze.
Silly.
Why stop at porn? Any objectionable words (like darn or poop), or any form of non-consensual contact (including Three Stooges pies in the face) must require photo ID to access. The internet is for everyone, after all.
l3mmypr0n@lemmynsfw.com 3 days ago
The “thing” is how to age gate materials on the internet. I said I’m up for a solution. What’s yours?
Holyginz@lemmy.world 2 days ago
There already is a solution. Parents need to be involved in restricting what their kids are viewing. Thats the solution, but parents dont want to do that, they want the sites to do the job for them.
l3mmypr0n@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
Nope. Its already been tried. The internet is too ubiquitous.
And that’s like saying, all liquor stores should not require ID, and it’s the parents fault if an underage kid acquires some booze.
Silly.
Holyginz@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Again, liquor store and this aren’t even remotely the same. So your example is irrelevant. Silly.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Why stop at porn? Any objectionable words (like darn or poop), or any form of non-consensual contact (including Three Stooges pies in the face) must require photo ID to access. The internet is for everyone, after all.
l3mmypr0n@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
No that’s not how the world works. All things are not for everybody. Ask any parent. Your kids do not get to run free and do whatever they want.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Exactly. So why should we require ID for porn and not for a bad word?